Orix Financial Services v. Haynes

56 A.D.2d 377, 867 N.Y.S.2d 332

This text of 56 A.D.2d 377 (Orix Financial Services v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orix Financial Services v. Haynes, 56 A.D.2d 377, 867 N.Y.S.2d 332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered September 6, 2007, which, in an action on a “conditional sale contract note,” denied plaintiffs unopposed motion pursuant to CELR 3215 for a default judgment and sua sponte dismissed the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings including entry of judgment.

The statute of limitations must be pleaded as an affirmative defense and cannot be asserted sua sponte by the court as a basis for denying an unopposed motion for a default judgment (see Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v Lee, 41 AD3d 183, 184 [2007]). We have reviewed plaintiffs submissions on the motion and find them sufficient for purposes of CELR 3215. Concur — Lippman, F.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Lee
41 A.D.3d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 377, 867 N.Y.S.2d 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orix-financial-services-v-haynes-nyappdiv-2008.