Orishagbemi v. Holder

532 F. App'x 408
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2013·No. No. 12-2227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Jaiye Jeje Orishagbemi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2013). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Orishagbemi (B.I.A. Sept. 27, 2012). Given this disposition, we deny the pending motion for stay of removal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orishagbemi v. Holder, 532 F. App'x 408 (4th Cir. 2013).

532 F. App'x 408 (Orishagbemi v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related