O'Riordan v. Nick F. Helmers, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Riordan v. Nick F. Helmers, Inc.

195 Misc. 168, 88 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2164

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Misc. 168 (O'Riordan v. Nick F. Helmers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Riordan v. Nick F. Helmers, Inc., 195 Misc. 168, 88 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record indicates that the defendants in

good faith relied on interpretations and rulings of the War Department, for which the work was being done, insofar as the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.) to plaintiff is concerned, and the action is therefore barred (Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, § 9; U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 258; Kenny v. Wigton-Abbott Corp., 80 F. Supp. 489, 496).

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendants, with costs.

Hoestadter, Pecora and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI