Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. v. Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 18, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-08991
StatusUnknown

This text of Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. v. Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company (Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. v. Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. v. Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x ORION PORTFOLIO SERVICES II, L.L.C., Plaintiff, 23-cv-8991 (PKC)

-against- ORDER

LEXINGTON FINANCE DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY,

Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------x

CASTEL, U.S.D.J. The limited subject matter jurisdiction of a district court is best addressed at the outset of a case. It falls upon the Court to raise issues of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte. “It is firmly established that diversity of citizenship should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record.” Leveraged Leasing Admin. Corp. v. PacifiCorp Cap., Inc., 87 F.3d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1996). Where a complaint premised on diversity of citizenship names a limited liability company as a party, the complaint must allege the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the limited liability company as well as the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities that are members of the limited liability company. See Platinum-Montaur Life Sciences, LLC v. Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., 943 F.3d 613, 615 (2d Cir. 2019); Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assocs. Ltd. Partnership, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000). “[A] statement of the parties’ residence is insufficient to establish their citizenship.” Leveraged Leasing, 87 F.3d at 47. There is no diversity jurisdiction if each side includes a citizen or subject of a foreign state. See, e.g., Franceskin v. Credit Suisse, 214 F.3d 253, 258 (2d Cir. 2000). The Complaint alleges that the sole member of plaintiff Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. “is Anurag Sett, who is a resident of Georgia.” (Compl’t § 8.) Defendant Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company ts alleged to be a foreign company with an address in Dublin, Ireland. (Compl’t § 9.) Within fourteen days of this Order, plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that expressly alleges the citizenship of Anurag Sett, as opposed to state of residence. If Sett is a Georgia citizen, the Amended Complaint should specify whether the Georgia at issue is the U.S. state or the country. SO ORDERED. LZ Fees LZ Pees Lael United States District Judge Dated: New York, New York October 18, 2023

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franceskin v. Credit Suisse
214 F.3d 253 (Second Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Orion Portfolio Services II, L.L.C. v. Lexington Finance Designated Activity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orion-portfolio-services-ii-llc-v-lexington-finance-designated-nysd-2023.