Orion Harold v. Hong Gao
This text of Orion Harold v. Hong Gao (Orion Harold v. Hong Gao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 25, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-11-00650-CV ____________
ORION HAROLD, Appellant
V.
HONG GAO, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 995022
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 18, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on July 27, 2011. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).
On September 22, 2011, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee on or before October 6, 2011, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Orion Harold v. Hong Gao, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orion-harold-v-hong-gao-texapp-2011.