Home/Supreme Court/Oriolo v. United States

Oriolo v. United States

324 U.S. 824, 65 S. Ct. 683
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 26, 1945·No. No. 727·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U. S. 369.

The [825] Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson think that the judgment should be affirmed, the Mortensen case being inapplicable for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court below. Mr. Thomas D. McBride for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oriolo v. United States, 324 U.S. 824, 65 S. Ct. 683 (1945).

324 U.S. 824 (Oriolo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kenneth Schneider
801 F.3d 186 (Third Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Schneider
817 F. Supp. 2d 586 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
Herman Edward Nelms v. United States of America, (Two Cases)
291 F.2d 390 (Fourth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. Sidney M. Ross
257 F.2d 292 (Second Circuit, 1958)
Ralph Becker v. United States
217 F.2d 555 (Eighth Circuit, 1954)
Langford v. United States
178 F.2d 48 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)