Orillon v. Roman
2 Mart. 151
Opinion
The impI~cation is suffici~t1y strong, to warrant the conclusion drawn by the appcllaht's counsel. The appeal will be sustain~ ed, and the cause continued, as one~of the j~dges has entertained a different opinion, an~ the Court is now composed of one ~udge only, in order that the opinion of the third judge may be had.
APPEAL SUSTAINETh
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orillon v. Roman, 2 Mart. 151 (La. 1812).
2 Mart. 151 (Orillon v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.