Original Crispy Pizza of Miami v. Palmeri

377 So. 2d 49, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16124
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 28, 1979
DocketNo. PP-496
StatusPublished

This text of 377 So. 2d 49 (Original Crispy Pizza of Miami v. Palmeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Original Crispy Pizza of Miami v. Palmeri, 377 So. 2d 49, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

Appellees move to dismiss the appeal in this workmen’s compensation proceeding on the ground that the appeal is untimely, having been taken within 30 days after the order of the judge of industrial claims was entered, Chapter 79-312, Section 14, Laws of Florida,1 but not within 20 days, Section [CXXX]*CXXX440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.).2 The order was entered September 20, 1979, and the notice of appeal was filed October 18, 1979. The appeal was not untimely, for within the time for appeal under the old statute, legislation became effective to enlarge the time for appeal, so granting appellant 30 days from September 20, 1979. See Mazda Motors of America v. S. C. Henderson & Sons, 364 So.2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The motion to dismiss is

DENIED.

MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT L. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mazda Motors of Am., Inc. v. SC Henderson & Sons, Inc.
364 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 So. 2d 49, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/original-crispy-pizza-of-miami-v-palmeri-fladistctapp-1979.