Oriental Boulevard Co. v. Heller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oriental Boulevard Co. v. Heller

34 A.D.2d 811, 313 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 811 (Oriental Boulevard Co. v. Heller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oriental Boulevard Co. v. Heller, 34 A.D.2d 811, 313 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, defendants appeal from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1969, August 5, 1969 and October 23, 1969, respectively. Appeal from order of June 10, 1969 dismissed as academic, without costs; that order was resettled by the order of August 5, 1969 and thus superseded. Order of August 5, 1969 modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which constitute the third decretal paragraph of the order of June 10, 1969 as resettled, which provisions extended for the plaintiffs-intervenors’ benefit the pendente lite injunction contained in an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 18, 1969, in this action. Order of October 23, 1969 modified, on the law, by deleting the third decretal paragraph thereof, which similarly extended the aforesaid pendente lite injunction. As so modified, orders of August 5, 1969 and October 23, 1969 affirmed. One bill of costs is awarded to defendants-appellants jointly against respondents filing separate briefs, to cover all the appeals. As the pendente lite injunction in the February 18, 1969 order has been terminated by our determination (herewith) in the companion appeal from that order, the provisions, in the orders herein modified, extending the injunction for the benefit of the plaintiffs-intervenors (respondents on these appeals) must likewise be terminated. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, defendants appeal from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1969, August 5, 1969 and October 23, 1969, respectively. Appeal from order of June 10, 1969 dismissed as academic, without costs; that order was resettled by the order of August 5, 1969 and thus superseded. Order of August 5, 1969 modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which constitute the third decretal paragraph of the order of June 10, 1969 as resettled, which provisions extended for the plaintiffs-intervenors’ benefit the pendente lite injunction contained in an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 18, 1969, in this action. Order of October 23, 1969 modified, on the law, by deleting the third decretal paragraph thereof, which similarly extended the aforesaid pendente lite injunction. As so modified, orders of August 5, 1969 and October 23, 1969 affirmed. One bill of costs is awarded to defendants-appellants jointly against respondents filing separate briefs, to cover all the appeals. As the pendente lite injunction in the February 18, 1969 order has been terminated by our determination (herewith) in the companion appeal from that order, the provisions, in the orders herein modified, extending the injunction for the benefit of the plaintiffs-intervenors (respondents on these appeals) must likewise be terminated. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 811, 313 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oriental-boulevard-co-v-heller-nyappdiv-1970.