Oriental Bank v. LeTang

CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands
DecidedFebruary 10, 2020
Docket3:18-cv-00099
StatusUnknown

This text of Oriental Bank v. LeTang (Oriental Bank v. LeTang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oriental Bank v. LeTang, (vid 2020).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 2018-99 ) EMANUEL LETANG, CATHERINE ) LETANG, ) ) Defendants. ) )

APPEARANCES:

Matthew Reinhardt Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For The Bank of Nova Scotia.

JUDGMENT

GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of The Bank of Nova Scotia for default judgment. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Having reviewed the record, the Court makes the following findings of fact: 1. Emanuel LeTang is the record owner of property described as Parcel No. 215-213 Estate Anna’s Retreat, No. 1 New Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, as shown on P.W.D. Map No. D9-270-T81, dated July 29, 1981.

(the “Property”). See ECF No. 1, Exh. H at 1. 2. On or about June 22, 2001, Emanuel LeTang and Catherine LeTang (collectively, the “LeTangs”) borrowed $148,000 from The Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”). 3. On June 22, 2001, the LeTangs executed and delivered a promissory note (the “Note”) to BNS in which they promised to pay BNS the principal sum of $148,000, plus interest at a rate of 7.75% per annum in monthly installments. 4. On June 22, 2001, the LeTangs delivered to BNS a real estate mortgage (the “Mortgage”) encumbering the Property and securing the Note. The Mortgage is attached to the Property. Pursuant to the Mortgage, BNS has the right to declare the full indebtedness of the Note due and payable and foreclose on the Property in the event of a default on

the Note. 5. On June 25, 2001, the Mortgage and Note were recorded at the Office of the Recorder of Deeds for the District of St. Thomas and St. John as Document No. 2001002900. 6. On May 12, 2015, the LeTangs and BNS executed a Loan Modification Agreement amending the Note. In the Loan Modification Agreement, the LeTangs promised to pay BNS the remaining principal and interest of $139,255.32, plus interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum in monthly installments. 7. On March 14, 2016, the Loan Modification Agreement was recorded at the Office of the Recorder of Deeds for the District of St. Thomas and St. John as Document No. 2016001594. 8. On or about June 1, 2017, the LeTangs failed to pay an installment on the Note when it became due. The LeTangs have failed to pay all subsequent payments. 9. On March 12, 2018, BNS gave the LeTangs written notice of the default on the Note. BNS requested payment within 30 days and advised the LeTangs that failure to cure the default would result in acceleration and foreclosure. 10. The LeTangs have not cured their default and made the required payment of principal and interest as required by

the Note and Mortgage. As a result, BNS accelerated the payment on the Note. 11. On November 21, 2018, BNS initiated this action against the LeTangs to enforce the terms and conditions of the Note and Mortgage. 12. On December 10, 2018, BNS served Emanuel LeTang by personally delivering him a summons and copy of the complaint. 13. On December 10, 2019, BNS served Catherine LeTang by leaving a summons and copy of the complaint with Emanuel LeTang, an adult that resided at Catherine LeTang’s home. 14. The LeTangs have not filed an answer to BNS’s complaint or otherwise appeared in this action. On April 30, 2019, the Clerk of Court entered default against the LeTangs. 15. Emanuel LeTang is a competent adult and is not on active duty for any branch of the United States Uniformed Services. 16. Catherine LeTang is a competent adult and is not on active duty for any branch of the United States Uniformed Services 17. The LeTangs are in default on the Note. As of December 31,

2019, the LeTangs are in debt to BNS in the principal amount of $159,394.41; plus interest on the Note in the amount of $19,374.10; costs in the amount of $3,826.46; late charges in the amount of $854.01; and reserve escrow in the amount of $3187.75. Interest continues to accrue on the Note at a rate of 5.5% per annum. As of December 31, 2019, the total amount of the LeTangs indebtedness to BNS under the Note is $159,394.41. II. DISCUSSION Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) allows courts to enter a default judgment against a properly served defendant who fails to file a timely responsive pleading. Anchorage Assoc. v. V.I. Bd. Of Tax Rev., 922 F.2d 168, 177 n.9 (3d Cir. 1990). A motion for entry of default judgment must contain evidence of the following: (1) that default was entered; (2) that the defendant has not appeared; (3) that the defendant is not an infant or incompetent; (4) that all pleadings were validly served upon the defendant; (5) the amount of judgment and how it was calculated; and (6) an affidavit of non-military service. See Bank of Nova Scotia v. Abdallah, No. CV 20012-0033, 2014 WL 2976232, at *3 (D.V.I. July 1, 2014). In addition, the Court

must consider three factors when determining whether to grant a default judgment: “(1) [the] prejudice to the plaintiff if default is denied, (2) whether the defendant appears to have a litigable defense, and (3) whether defendant’s delay is due to culpable conduct.” Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir. 2000). III. ANALYSIS

To prevail on a debt and foreclosure claim, the plaintiff must show that: (1) the debtor executed a promissory note and mortgage; (2) the debtor is in default under the terms of the note and mortgage; and (3) the lender is authorized to foreclose on the property mortgaged as security for the note. Thompson v. Florida Wood Treaters, Inc., 52 V.I. 986, 995 (D.V.I. 2009). The facts found by the Court establish each of the elements for a debt and foreclosure claim. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of BNS for default judgment docketed at ECF Number 14 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that BNS shall recover jointly and severally from Emanuel LeTang and Catherine LeTang the principal amount of $159,394.41; plus interest on the Note in the amount of $19,374.10; costs in the amount of $3,826.46; late charges in the amount of $854.01; and reserve escrow in the amount of

$3187.75. Interest continues to accrue on the principal at a rate of 5.5% per annum from December 31, 2019, until the date of judgment; it is further ORDERED that the Mortgage is a first priority lien; it is further ORDERED that the Mortgage, and any liens on the Property subsequent to the recording of the Mortgage are hereby foreclosed; it is further ORDERED that the Property shall be sold by the United States Marshal according to law and the proceeds of such sale shall be applied first to the expenses associated with any sale, including but not limited to the costs of publication and the commission assessed by the United States Marshal’s Service pursuant to Title 28, Section 1921 of the United States Code. Second, the proceeds of such sale shall be applied toward satisfaction of this Judgment in favor of the United States, including any costs and attorney’s fees that may be awarded upon application and any sums that may be paid by United States for insurance premiums, taxes, and expenditures necessary to maintain the Property pending sale with interest from the date of any such payment. Pursuant to Title 5, Section 489(5) of the Virgin Islands Code, the surplus, if any, remaining after application of the proceeds as provided above, shall be returned

to the debtor; and it is further ORDERED that 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oriental Bank v. LeTang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oriental-bank-v-letang-vid-2020.