Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro

202 N.E.2d 810, 348 Mass. 774
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 1, 1964·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed with costs to the defendant. A master was justified by his subsidiary findings in concluding in effect that De Mauro, with the plaintiff’s consent, reasonably improved a way without excess excavation, damage to the plaintiff, or material interference with the road level near the plaintiff’s buildings. Upon the basis of the confirmed master’s report a final decree dismissing the bill (seeking principally restoration of removed soil) was properly entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro, 202 N.E.2d 810, 348 Mass. 774 (Mass. 1964).

202 N.E.2d 810 (Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.