Orick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Orick v. State

863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 2004·No. No. 1D02-2973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the trial court’s order admitting similar fact evidence under the abuse of discretion standard. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). We are assisted in that task by the thorough order entered by the trial judge. The factual conclusions in that order are supported by the evidence. Moreover, the trial judge’s decision to admit evidence pursuant to section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes, was well within the judge’s discretion.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We review the trial court’s order admitting similar fact evidence under the abuse of discretion standard. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). We are assisted in that task by the thorough order entered by the trial judge. The factual conclusions in that order are supported by the evidence. Moreover, the trial judge’s decision to admit evidence pursuant to section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes, was well within the judge’s discretion.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Orick v. State, 863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

863 So. 2d 463 (Orick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related