Orick v. State
This text of 863 So. 2d 463 (Orick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We review the trial court’s order admitting similar fact evidence under the abuse of discretion standard. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). We are assisted in that task by the thorough order entered by the trial judge. The factual conclusions in that order are supported by the evidence. Moreover, the trial judge’s decision to admit evidence pursuant to section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes, was well within the judge’s discretion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orick-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.