Orick v. State

863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2004
DocketNo. 1D02-2973
StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 463 (Orick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orick v. State, 863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the trial court’s order admitting similar fact evidence under the abuse of discretion standard. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). We are assisted in that task by the thorough order entered by the trial judge. The factual conclusions in that order are supported by the evidence. Moreover, the trial judge’s decision to admit evidence pursuant to section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes, was well within the judge’s discretion.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. State
702 So. 2d 186 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Jackson v. Walker
523 U.S. 1083 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 So. 2d 463, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 388, 2004 WL 86181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orick-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.