Orgill Bros. & Co. v. Saucier

Mississippi Supreme Court

Orgill Bros. & Co. v. Saucier

176 So. 2d 480, 253 Miss. 587, 1965 Miss. LEXIS 1017

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 1965·No. No. 43582·Published

Opinion

Brady, Tom P., J.

We have carefully studied the charadic evidence of this record. Like an iceberg which reveals only one-tenth of itself, the proof here is inadequate. We have come to the same conclusion which the learned circuit judge reached, namely, it is regrettable that the essential evidence, if it be true, has not been proven. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ethridge, P. J., and Gillespie, Patterson and Inzer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady, Tom P., J.

We have carefully studied the charadic evidence of this record. Like an iceberg which reveals only one-tenth of itself, the proof here is inadequate. We have come to the same conclusion which the learned circuit judge reached, namely, it is regrettable that the essential evidence, if it be true, has not been proven. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ethridge, P. J., and Gillespie, Patterson and Inzer, JJ., concur.

Orgill Bros. & Co. v. Saucier, 176 So. 2d 480, 253 Miss. 587, 1965 Miss. LEXIS 1017 (Mich. 1965).

Pincite

176 So. 2d 480 (Orgill Bros. & Co. v. Saucier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.