Orgeron v. Hourgettes

67 So. 2d 749, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 788
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Orgeron v. Hourgettes. Read the opinion of the Court — 1953 La. App. LEXIS 786
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 2, 1953·No. No. 19919·Published

Opinions

McBRIDE, Judge.

This is one of the seven suits mentioned in the case of Gaida v. Hourgettes, La.App., 67 So.2d 737, an opinion and decree in which was handed down by us this day. The plaintiff was one of the asphyxiated persons and her claim is for personal injuries. In connection with her asphyxiation she suffered dizziness, nausea, deafness, and headaches for several days, and remained about her home for one week. We think that $200. would constitute a proper allowance.

Therefore, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and it is now ordered that the plaintiff herein, Mrs. Ruth Mildred Orge-ron, wife of Aby A. Barrios, have judgment against the defendant, Mrs. Elaine Hourgettes, wife of D. M. Charles, for the full sum of $200, with legal interest from judicial demand, and for the costs of both courts.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orgeron v. Hourgettes, 67 So. 2d 749, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 788 (La. Ct. App. 1953).

67 So. 2d 749 (Orgeron v. Hourgettes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaida v. Hourgettes
67 So. 2d 737 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)