Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank

8 A.D.2d 788, 187 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 788 (Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank, 8 A.D.2d 788, 187 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is not necessary to plead the matter contained in the separate defense and counterclaim in order to ensure- its materiality under the pleadings. If defendant offers evidence relating to the allegations of the aforementioned defense and counterclaim, it will be for the trial court to pass upon its admissibility. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is not necessary to plead the matter contained in the separate defense and counterclaim in order to ensure- its materiality under the pleadings. If defendant offers evidence relating to the allegations of the aforementioned defense and counterclaim, it will be for the trial court to pass upon its admissibility. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 788, 187 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oresky-v-manhattan-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1959.