Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 2007
Docket2006-2244
StatusPublished

This text of 862 N.E.2d 111 (Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-T-135. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of parties’ joint motion to remand this cause to the Board of Tax Appeals,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement the settlement agreement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oreo-corp-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-revision-ohio-2007.