Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 2007·No. 2006-2244·Published

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-T-135. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of parties’ joint motion to remand this cause to the Board of Tax Appeals,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement the settlement agreement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 2007).

862 N.E.2d 111 (Oreo Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.