Orenstein v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Orenstein v. Perales

180 A.D.2d 443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 A.D.2d 443 (Orenstein v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orenstein v. Perales, 180 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the respondent Commissioner Perales dated May 8, 1989, which affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner Grinker, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s request for storage fees, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Carol E. Huff, J.], entered January 18, 1990), is dismissed.

Petitioner, evicted from his home in October, 1986, placed certain personal belongings in storage, while he resided in a shelter for the next five months. In April, 1987, petitioner moved to a furnished room at the Capitol Hall Hotel, where he continues to reside. After payment for the five months, petitioner’s continuing request for storage fees was properly denied. 18 NYCRR 352.6 (f), on which petitioner relies, has been held to apply in cases of "short-term temporary emergencies”, and not to authorize indefinite storage (Matter of Marquart v Perales, 142 AD2d 678, 679). Since it is clear that petitioner is presently housed in permanent accommodations, and that the emergency need for storage facilities has long passed, the denial of storage fees is supported by substantial evidence. (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the respondent Commissioner Perales dated May 8, 1989, which affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner Grinker, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s request for storage fees, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Carol E. Huff, J.], entered January 18, 1990), is dismissed.

Petitioner, evicted from his home in October, 1986, placed certain personal belongings in storage, while he resided in a shelter for the next five months. In April, 1987, petitioner moved to a furnished room at the Capitol Hall Hotel, where he continues to reside. After payment for the five months, petitioner’s continuing request for storage fees was properly denied. 18 NYCRR 352.6 (f), on which petitioner relies, has been held to apply in cases of "short-term temporary emergencies”, and not to authorize indefinite storage (Matter of Marquart v Perales, 142 AD2d 678, 679). Since it is clear that petitioner is presently housed in permanent accommodations, and that the emergency need for storage facilities has long passed, the denial of storage fees is supported by substantial evidence. (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.D.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orenstein-v-perales-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack