Orenstein v. Perales
This text of 594 N.E.2d 937 (Orenstein v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying petitioner’s motion to enlarge the record, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order which denied reargument of the motion to enlarge the record, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 N.E.2d 937, 79 N.Y.2d 1037, 584 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orenstein-v-perales-ny-1992.