Oreña v. Sherman

61 Cal. 101, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 549
California Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1882·No. No. 7,998·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court :

Section 3633 of the Political Code, can not be held to be unconstitutional unless it be inconsistent with some provision of the Constitution, and as we read Section 8 of Article xiii. of the Constitution there is no inconsistency between said section of the Code and the Constitution. As we construe the Constitution, that section of the Code might be enacted now.

We think that the entry on the assessment book opposite the name of appellant, that he had “neglected to return statement as required by Section 3629, Political Code,” sufficient. The law says that the Assessor “must note the refusal on the assessment book,” etc. It seems to us that the entry which he made was the equivalent of that.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oreña v. Sherman, 61 Cal. 101, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 549 (Cal. 1882).

61 Cal. 101 (Oreña v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

L. B. Foster Co. v. County of Los Angeles
265 Cal. App. 2d 24 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wright
53 S.E. 251 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Henne v. Los Angeles County
59 P. 780 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
People v. Pittsburg Railroad
8 P. 381 (California Supreme Court, 1885)