Orellana v. DUTCHER AVENUE BUILDERS INC.

906 N.E.2d 1082, 12 N.Y.3d 804, 2009 NY Slip Op 68849, 879 N.Y.S.2d 48, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 606
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 7, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 906 N.E.2d 1082 (Orellana v. DUTCHER AVENUE BUILDERS INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orellana v. DUTCHER AVENUE BUILDERS INC., 906 N.E.2d 1082, 12 N.Y.3d 804, 2009 NY Slip Op 68849, 879 N.Y.S.2d 48, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 606 (N.Y. 2009).

Opinion

*805 Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by Christopher Meagher, dismissed upon the ground that he is not a party aggrieved as the complaint has been dismissed against him; motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by Ellen Meagher, dismissed upon the ground that as to her the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Halloran v. O'Halloran
906 N.E.2d 1082 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
906 N.E.2d 1082, 12 N.Y.3d 804, 2009 NY Slip Op 68849, 879 N.Y.S.2d 48, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orellana-v-dutcher-avenue-builders-inc-ny-2009.