Orellana et al. v. Palacious Drywall Inc. et al.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedNovember 3, 2025
Docket1:23-cv-01962
StatusUnknown

This text of Orellana et al. v. Palacious Drywall Inc. et al. (Orellana et al. v. Palacious Drywall Inc. et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orellana et al. v. Palacious Drywall Inc. et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x ORELLANA ET AL., : : Plaintiffs, : 23-CV-1962 (AT) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : PALACIOUS DRYWALL INC. ET AL., : Defendants. : : : --------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: This matter has been referred to me for Inquest following a default. (ECF 62). By December 5, 2025, Plaintiff shall file (1) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (2) an inquest memorandum setting forth proof of damages. Plaintiff’s proposed damages figures should be supported by documentary evidence and/or one or more affidavits establishing the proposed figures. Plaintiff must also include documentation supporting the requested attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff must serve these documents on the Defaulting Defendants and file a proof of service on the docket by December 5, 2025. Defendants’ opposition papers (if any) shall be filed by January 5, 2025. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it may conduct this inquest solely on the written submissions of the parties. See Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991). If any party seeks an evidentiary hearing on damages, such party must include the request in its papers, as well as provide reasons why a hearing is necessary and detail what types of additional evidence would be presented at the hearing. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on the Defaulting Defendants and file proof of service on the docket by November 14, 2025.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: November 3, 2025 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Orellana et al. v. Palacious Drywall Inc. et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orellana-et-al-v-palacious-drywall-inc-et-al-nysd-2025.