O'Reilly v. Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Reilly v. Stephens

67 N.Y.S. 1141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.Y.S. 1141 (O'Reilly v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Reilly v. Stephens, 67 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the circumstances adverted to by the defendant’s counsel respecting the conduct of the trial justify the criticism made by him. They certainly cannot be said to have operated to the prejudice of his client, in view of the fact that the plaintiff’s evidence respecting the defendant’s liability is absolutely without contradiction. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the circumstances adverted to by the defendant’s counsel respecting the conduct of the trial justify the criticism made by him. They certainly cannot be said to have operated to the prejudice of his client, in view of the fact that the plaintiff’s evidence respecting the defendant’s liability is absolutely without contradiction. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oreilly-v-stephens-nyappdiv-1900.