O'Reilly v. Samuels

Appellate Court of Illinois

O'Reilly v. Samuels

55 Ill. App. 438, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 448

DecidedDecember 6, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Ill. App. 438 (O'Reilly v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Reilly v. Samuels, 55 Ill. App. 438, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 448 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action upon a promissory note.

The defendant endeavored to show by cross-examination of the plaintiff that the note was given for losses sustained in a gambling transaction on the Board of Trade.

Only a question of fact is involved. We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the judgment of the Superior Court and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action upon a promissory note.

The defendant endeavored to show by cross-examination of the plaintiff that the note was given for losses sustained in a gambling transaction on the Board of Trade.

Only a question of fact is involved. We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the judgment of the Superior Court and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Ill. App. 438, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oreilly-v-samuels-illappct-1894.