O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad
240 A.D. 1009
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Order extending plaintiff’s time within which to consent to reduce the verdict affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of Cullen v. Uptegrove & Brother (101 App. Div. 147). Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad, 240 A.D. 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 1009 (O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cullen v. William E. Uptegrove & Bros.
101 A.D. 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)