O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad
240 A.D. 1009
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1933
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished
This text of 240 A.D. 1009 (O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Reilly v. New York Central Railroad, 240 A.D. 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Order extending plaintiff’s time within which to consent to reduce the verdict affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of Cullen v. Uptegrove & Brother (101 App. Div. 147). Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cullen v. William E. Uptegrove & Bros.
101 A.D. 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oreilly-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1933.