Oregonians in Action v. LCDC

Oregon Supreme Court

Oregonians in Action v. LCDC

DecidedJanuary 29, 1998

DocketS44822

StatusPublished

This text of Oregonians in Action v. LCDC (Oregonians in Action v. LCDC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oregonians in Action v. LCDC, (Or. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Filed: January 29, 1998

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

OREGONIANS IN ACTION,

Respondent on Review,

v.

LAND CONSERVATION AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION,

Petitioner on Review,

and

McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor/Petitioner on Review.

(CA A91720; SC S44822, S44823)

On review from the Court of Appeals.*

Submitted on petitions for review filed December 15, 1997, and December 16, 1997.

F. Blair Batson, Portland, filed the petition for intervenor/petitioner on review McKay Creek Valley Association.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review Land Conservation and Development Commission. With her on the petition were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

David J. Hunnicutt, Tigard, filed the response for respondent on review.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitions for review are allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of Lane County v. LCDC, 325 Or 569, 942 P2d 278 (1997).

*Judicial review from the Land Conservation and Development Commission.

147 Or App 342, 936 P2d 372 (1997).

**Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI