Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v. Secretary of State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v. Secretary of State

797 P.2d 386, 103 Or. App. 323

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 5, 1990

DocketCA A50974; CA A50975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 797 P.2d 386 (Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v. Secretary of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v. Secretary of State, 797 P.2d 386, 103 Or. App. 323 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

NEWMAN, J.

In November, 1988, the Secretary of State (respondent) issued two orders that imposed civil penalties on Oregon Peaceworks Green, a political action committee (PAC), for failing to file financial reports as ORS 246.021 requires. See ORS 260.232. Mary Ellen Daley filed petitions for judicial review and supporting briefs in this court on behalf of the PAC. Daley was the PAC’s treasurer when she filed the petitions and briefs, but she had not been the treasurer when the reports were due. She signed the petitions as “Treasurer, Oregon Peaceworks Green PAC.” She signed the briefs as “Treasurer, Oregon Peaceworks PAC, Attorney for Self,” although the covers of the briefs described her as “Attorney for Appellant.” Respondent has moved to strike the petitions for judicial review and briefs, on the ground that Daley lacked authority to file them on behalf of the PAC.¹ We deny the motions.

Respondent argues that, because Daley is not an active member of the Oregon State Bar or a party, she may not file the petitions for judicial review or briefs on behalf of the PAC. ORS 260.232; ORS 183.480. The PAC, however, is a person, ORS 260.005(10)²; ORS 260.005(H),³ and it is a party aggrieved or adversely affected by the Secretary of State’s orders. ORS 183.480.

ORS 183.480 does not say who may file a petition for judicial review or briefs on behalf of a party. Under ORS 9.320, which is applicable to this proceeding, ORAP 4.05, a party may prosecute or defend any action, suit or proceeding in person or by an attorney, except that the state or a corporation [326]*326must appear by an attorney in all cases, unless otherwise specifically provided by law. The PAC is neither the state nor a corporation, and, therefore, it may appear in person in seeking judicial review of respondent’s orders.

A political committee that appears in person must do so through an individual who is authorized to speak for it. The individual need not be a member of the Oregon State Bar, a party or an individual personally liable for penalties. Respondent considered Daley, as the PAC’s treasurer, to be authorized to appear on its behalf at the hearing level. Respondent directed the notices of penalty and notices of hearing to her. She gave an affidavit as the representative of the PAC before the hearings officer. Daley, as treasurer of the PAC, was an appropriate individual to act on behalf of the PAC.⁴

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NEWMAN, J.

In November, 1988, the Secretary of State (respondent) issued two orders that imposed civil penalties on Oregon Peaceworks Green, a political action committee (PAC), for failing to file financial reports as ORS 246.021 requires. See ORS 260.232. Mary Ellen Daley filed petitions for judicial review and supporting briefs in this court on behalf of the PAC. Daley was the PAC’s treasurer when she filed the petitions and briefs, but she had not been the treasurer when the reports were due. She signed the petitions as “Treasurer, Oregon Peaceworks Green PAC.” She signed the briefs as “Treasurer, Oregon Peaceworks PAC, Attorney for Self,” although the covers of the briefs described her as “Attorney for Appellant.” Respondent has moved to strike the petitions for judicial review and briefs, on the ground that Daley lacked authority to file them on behalf of the PAC.¹ We deny the motions.

Respondent argues that, because Daley is not an active member of the Oregon State Bar or a party, she may not file the petitions for judicial review or briefs on behalf of the PAC. ORS 260.232; ORS 183.480. The PAC, however, is a person, ORS 260.005(10)²; ORS 260.005(H),³ and it is a party aggrieved or adversely affected by the Secretary of State’s orders. ORS 183.480.

ORS 183.480 does not say who may file a petition for judicial review or briefs on behalf of a party. Under ORS 9.320, which is applicable to this proceeding, ORAP 4.05, a party may prosecute or defend any action, suit or proceeding in person or by an attorney, except that the state or a corporation [326]*326must appear by an attorney in all cases, unless otherwise specifically provided by law. The PAC is neither the state nor a corporation, and, therefore, it may appear in person in seeking judicial review of respondent’s orders.

A political committee that appears in person must do so through an individual who is authorized to speak for it. The individual need not be a member of the Oregon State Bar, a party or an individual personally liable for penalties. Respondent considered Daley, as the PAC’s treasurer, to be authorized to appear on its behalf at the hearing level. Respondent directed the notices of penalty and notices of hearing to her. She gave an affidavit as the representative of the PAC before the hearings officer. Daley, as treasurer of the PAC, was an appropriate individual to act on behalf of the PAC.⁴

Motions denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

797 P.2d 386, 103 Or. App. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oregon-peaceworks-green-pac-v-secretary-of-state-orctapp-1990.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack