Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng

899 F.2d 1565, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6062
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 1990
Docket88-4092
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 899 F.2d 1565 (Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng, 899 F.2d 1565, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6062 (9th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

899 F.2d 1565

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; Hells Canyon Preservation
Council; Friends of Lake Fork; Ric Bailey,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Richard LYNG, Secretary of Agriculture; U.S. Forest
Service; Robert Richmond, Wallowa-Whitman
National Forest Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees,
Eagle Cap Logging, Inc.; RMH Aeroservices, Inc.;
Boise-Cascade Corp.; Ellingson Lumber Co.; Idaho Timber
Corp. of Oregon, Inc.; North Powder Lumber Co.; Sequoia
Forest Industries; Union Forest Products Co.; Northwest
Timber Workers Resource Council; Save Our Snake,
Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees.

No. 88-4092.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 19, 1990.

Before WRIGHT, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In his petition for rehearing, the Secretary contends that he was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard on the issue of attorneys' fees. We agree. Accordingly, the opinion is amended by deleting Section IV entitled "Attorneys' Fees," 882 F.2d 1417 at pages 1427-28 and replacing it with the following:

ONRC seeks attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act for both the underlying district court action and for the appeal. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 39-1.8, consideration of all such fee matters is ordered transferred for a determination de novo to the district court.

At page 1428, the fourth sentence of the CONCLUSION starting with "On remand, the district court...." is ordered deleted from the opinion.

With the opinion so amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing filed by both parties. Both are denied.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Audubon Society v. U.S. Forest Service
4 F.3d 832 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Madigan
980 F.2d 1330 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Headwaters, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Management
914 F.2d 1174 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 F.2d 1565, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oregon-natural-resources-council-v-lyng-ca9-1990.