Oregon Mountain, Inc. v. Soules

6 A.D.3d 1192, 775 N.Y.S.2d 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oregon Mountain, Inc. v. Soules. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 A.D.3d 1193
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered June 19, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[1193]*1193It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oregon Mountain, Inc. v. Soules, 6 A.D.3d 1192, 775 N.Y.S.2d 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 1192 (Oregon Mountain, Inc. v. Soules) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)