Oregon Mesabi Corporation v. C. D. Johnson Lumber Corp.

Ninth Circuit

Oregon Mesabi Corporation v. C. D. Johnson Lumber Corp.

166 F.2d 1003, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2398

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 18, 1948

DocketNos. 11569, 11570

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 1003 (Oregon Mesabi Corporation v. C. D. Johnson Lumber Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oregon Mesabi Corporation v. C. D. Johnson Lumber Corp., 166 F.2d 1003, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2398 (9th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to recover as costs on his appeals in these cases (a) the expenditure for his briefs and (b) a reasonable attor-mey’s fee.

(a) A rule of the Supreme Court of Oregon allows the cost of printed briefs not exceeding $1.25 a page in all appeals. Appellant claims the Conformity Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 724, requires us to make the ■same allowance. There is no merit in this contention. The law of this forum prevails as to such general cost provisions. Henkel v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry Co., 284 U. S. 444, 52 S.Ct. 223, 76 L.Ed 386. It does not include the cost of briefs on appeal.

(b) Section 12-410, Oregon Compiled Statutes Annotated, provides that:

“The costs and disbursements of the defendant, including a reasonable attorney’s fee to be fixed by the court at the trial, shall be taxed by the clerk and recovered from the corporation, but if it appear that such corporation tendered the defendant before commencing the action an amount equal to or greater than that assessed by the jury, in such case the corporation shall recover its costs and disbursements from the defendant, but the defendant shall not be required to pay the plaintiff's attorney fee.”

Appellant claims that since the statute specifically allows costs in a condemnation proceeding, such a fee should be allowed by this court. The law of Oregon as appearing in Lewis v. Continental Casualty Co., 135 Or. 170, 173, 295 P. 450, involving an analogous Oregon statute specially allowing attorneys’ fees as costs in insurance cases is to the contrary. There as here the Oregon Laws of 1930, § 46-134, provided for attorneys’ fees to be determined at the trial. It was held that they were allowable only in the lower court. Our decision in Horwitz v. New York Life Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 80 F.2d 295, 302, awarding attorneys’ fees on appeal in an insurance case, was based on the Oregon statute as amended in 1931 allowing such costs on appeal.

The motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to recover as costs on his appeals in these cases (a) the expenditure for his briefs and (b) a reasonable attor-mey’s fee.

(a) A rule of the Supreme Court of Oregon allows the cost of printed briefs not exceeding $1.25 a page in all appeals. Appellant claims the Conformity Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 724, requires us to make the ■same allowance. There is no merit in this contention. The law of this forum prevails as to such general cost provisions. Henkel v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry Co., 284 U. S. 444, 52 S.Ct. 223, 76 L.Ed 386. It does not include the cost of briefs on appeal.

(b) Section 12-410, Oregon Compiled Statutes Annotated, provides that:

“The costs and disbursements of the defendant, including a reasonable attorney’s fee to be fixed by the court at the trial, shall be taxed by the clerk and recovered from the corporation, but if it appear that such corporation tendered the defendant before commencing the action an amount equal to or greater than that assessed by the jury, in such case the corporation shall recover its costs and disbursements from the defendant, but the defendant shall not be required to pay the plaintiff's attorney fee.”

Appellant claims that since the statute specifically allows costs in a condemnation proceeding, such a fee should be allowed by this court. The law of Oregon as appearing in Lewis v. Continental Casualty Co., 135 Or. 170, 173, 295 P. 450, involving an analogous Oregon statute specially allowing attorneys’ fees as costs in insurance cases is to the contrary. There as here the Oregon Laws of 1930, § 46-134, provided for attorneys’ fees to be determined at the trial. It was held that they were allowable only in the lower court. Our decision in Horwitz v. New York Life Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 80 F.2d 295, 302, awarding attorneys’ fees on appeal in an insurance case, was based on the Oregon statute as amended in 1931 allowing such costs on appeal.

The motions are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 1003, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oregon-mesabi-corporation-v-c-d-johnson-lumber-corp-ca9-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack