Oregon & C. R. v. United States
This text of 109 F. 514 (Oregon & C. R. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the authority of Hewitt v. Schultz (February 15, 1901) 21 Sup. Ct. 309, 45 L. Ed. 463; Grinnell v. Railroad Co., 103 U. S. 739, 26 L. Ed. 456; St. Paul & S. C. R. Co. v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 112 U. S. 720, 5 Sup. Ct. 334, 28 L. Ed. 872; Sioux City & St. P. R. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 117 U. S. 406, 6 Sup. Ct. 790, 29 L. Ed. 928; U. S. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., 141 U. S. 374, 12 Sup. Ct. 13, 35 L. Ed. 766, — the judgment in each of the above-entitled cases is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. 514, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oregon-c-r-v-united-states-ca9-1901.