Orefice v. Albert

239 So. 2d 46
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1970
DocketNos. 68-995, 69-93
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 239 So. 2d 46 (Orefice v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orefice v. Albert, 239 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

The mandate of this court issued in this cause on September 9, 1969 is withdrawn.

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida in the above styled cause filed July 1, 1970 (237 So.2d 142), the prior opinion and judgment of this court (226 So.2d 15) is hereby modified as directed by the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida and, except as modified, is adhered to. The cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Dade County for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida and this court. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watts v. National Insurance Underwriters
540 F. Supp. 488 (S.D. Florida, 1982)
Durrett v. Davidson
239 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orefice-v-albert-fladistctapp-1970.