O'Rear's adm'rs v. Kiger
10 Va. 622
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, that the contract set out in the declaration did not come within the proviso contained in the fourth section of the statute against buying and selling offices, but was plainly within the three first sections of that statute, and was therefore illegal and voidt and that, therefore, the judgment should be reversed, and judgment entered for the defendants .on the demurrer to the declaration.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Rear's adm'rs v. Kiger, 10 Va. 622 (Va. 1840).
10 Va. 622 (O'Rear's adm'rs v. Kiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salling v. M'Kinney
19 Am. Dec. 722 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1829)