O'Rear's adm'rs v. Kiger
This text of 10 Va. 622 (O'Rear's adm'rs v. Kiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, that the contract set out in the declaration did not come within the proviso contained in the fourth section of the statute against buying and selling offices, but was plainly within the three first sections of that statute, and was therefore illegal and voidt and that, therefore, the judgment should be reversed, and judgment entered for the defendants .on the demurrer to the declaration.
Scott, J. dissented.
The reporter understood, that the court did not mean to disturb the authority of Sailing v. M’Kinney, 1 Leigh 42.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Va. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orears-admrs-v-kiger-va-1840.