Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail

Fourth Circuit

Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail

452 F. App'x 302

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2011·No. No. 11-1660·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ore v. Hampton Rds. Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ore v. Hampton Rds. Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, 452 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

452 F. App'x 302 (Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related