Ordono v. Quintana

202 So. 2d 178, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3388
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 10, 1967·No. No. 36247·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is here on petition for writ of certiorari supported by certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that its decision is one which involves a question of great public interest. See Section 4(2), Article V, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A.

The factual circumstances, background and questions involved are set forth in the [179]*179decision of the District Court reported at 195 So.2d 577 (Fla.App.3rd 1967).

The writ issued and oral argument by the parties has been heard. We hold that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided the issue before it, and we adopt such as the ruling of this court.

The writ of certiorari is accordingly

Discharged.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordono v. Quintana, 202 So. 2d 178, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3388 (Ala. 1967).

202 So. 2d 178 (Ordono v. Quintana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Koesling
210 B.R. 487 (N.D. Florida, 1997)
Nicole v. Nicole-Sauri
648 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
In Re Estate of Santos
648 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Sanchez v. Sanchez De Davila
547 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)