Ordinary of State v. Boyer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ordinary of State v. Boyer

157 A. 95, 9 N.J. Misc. 1127, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118

DecidedNovember 14, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 95 (Ordinary of State v. Boyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ordinary of State v. Boyer, 157 A. 95, 9 N.J. Misc. 1127, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Bkown, S. C. C.

This matter is presented on the plaintiff’s motion to strike the “Fourth Separate Defense” of defendant’s answer on the ground that the same is sham. The moving party has presented proof that the allegations in the defense mentioned are sham. There being no answering affidavits it follows that the motion to strike should prevail.

An order may be presented in accordance with this finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bkown, S. C. C.

This matter is presented on the plaintiff’s motion to strike the “Fourth Separate Defense” of defendant’s answer on the ground that the same is sham. The moving party has presented proof that the allegations in the defense mentioned are sham. There being no answering affidavits it follows that the motion to strike should prevail.

An order may be presented in accordance with this finding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 95, 9 N.J. Misc. 1127, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ordinary-of-state-v-boyer-nj-1931.