ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE. ADM10-8041

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedAugust 3, 2016
DocketADM10-8041
StatusPublished

This text of ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE. ADM10-8041 (ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE. ADM10-8041) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE. ADM10-8041, (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

STATE OF MINNESOTA fiLl August 1, 2016

IN SUPREME COURT Om~EOF APPB..lA1ECcuns ADM 10-8041 ADM 10-8040

ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE

Following amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure promulgated

in 2015, we directed the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Rules of Juvenile

Protection, Adoption, and Guardian Ad Litem Procedure to monitor the rules and report by

April 1, 2016, whether the committee recommended any additional amendments to

facilitate the continued transition by the judicial branch to a more universal electronic court

environment. The committee met in 2016 to address issues and questions that arose after

the 20 15 amendments to the rules and to consider possible amendments in light of other

changes in the law. On March 30, 2016, the committee filed its report, which

recommended amendments to clarify public access to juvenile-protection case records, and

recommended technical amendments to resolve discrepancies with other laws.

In an order filed April 21, 2016, we opened a public-comment period on the

proposed amendments to these rules. Four written comments were filed, by the Minnesota

State Bar Association, the Minnesota County Attorneys Association, the Minnesota

Department of Human Services, and the Ombudsperson for American Indian Families.

The court has carefully considered the committee's recommendations and the

comments. Based on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The attached amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure be,

and the same are, prescribed and promulgated to be effective as of October 1, 2016. The

rules as amended shall apply to all cases pending on, or filed on or after, the effective date,

except that Rule 8.04, as amended, shall apply only to documents filed with a court on or

after October 1, 2016.

2. The inclusion of committee comments is for convenience and does not reflect

court approval of those comments.

3. The written comment of the Ombudsperson for American Indian Families

filed June 20, 2016, is referred to the Advisory Committee for review and consideration,

and the committee shall continue to serve and monitor the rules and these amendments as

further directed by the court.

Dated: August 1, 2016 BY THE COURT:

Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

2 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADM10-8041

MEMORANDUM

PER CURIAM.

Following the 2015 amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure, the

Advisory Committee met in 2016 to review questions that were raised about access to

public records in juvenile protection cases. The committee thoroughly discussed the issues

and questions presented by electronic access to case records, and in a report filed March

30, 2016, recommended amendments to Rule 8 to further refine the list of documents and

information that remain confidential under these rules. Written comments were filed by

the Minnesota State Bar Association, the Minnesota County Attorneys Association, the

Ombudsperson for American Indian Families, and the Commissioner of the Minnesota

Department of Human Services.

In the amendments promulgated today, we have adopted some of the proposed

revisions offered by the commenters, and we refer to the Advisory Committee for the Rules

on Juvenile Protection Procedure the Ombudsperson's comment regarding Rule 8.04,

subdivision 2(k). With respect to comments regarding access to public case records,

however, we repeat what we said in 2015: although the concerns that must be balanced in

these matters are weighty, Rule 8.04, subdivision 2, achieves the proper balance between

and among privacy interests, transparency and accountability, and the paramount concerns

of a child's best interests. We therefore decline to adopt the suggestions offered in the

comments to further restrict public access to these case records. AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE

[Note: In the following amendments, deletions are indicated by a line drawn through the words and additions are indicated by a line drawn under the words.]

1. Amend Rule 1.01, as follows:

Rule 1.01. Scope

These rules govern the procedure for juvenile protection matters in the juvenile courts in Minnesota. Juvenile protection matters include all matters defined in Rule 2.0 l(M_lli).

2. Amend Rule 3.06, as follows:

Rule 3.06. General Rules of Practice for the District Courts

Except as otherwise provided by statute or these rules, Rules 1-2, 4-+4.1Q, and 901- 907 of the General Rules of Practice for the District Courts apply to juvenile protection matters. Rules 3 and 101-814 of the General Rules of Practice for the District Courts do not apply to juvenile protection matters. Rule 5 of the General Rules of Practice for the District Courts does not apply to attorneys who represent Indian tribes in juvenile protection matters.

3. Amend Rule 8.03, as follows:

Rule 8.03. Access to Records Filed Prior to July 2015; Access to Records Upon Appeal

(a) Access to Records Filed Before July 1, 2015. For juvenile protection case records filed before July 1, 2015, or for case records filed before October 1, 2016, in cases where a child is a party, confidential information to which access is restricted under Rule 8.04 shall, if necessary, be redacted by or at the direction of court administration staff prior to allowing access to any party, participant, or member of the public. In the case of a request for access to a petition filed before July 1, 2015, when a redacted petition has not been filed as required under Rule 33.01, court administration staff may notifY the petitioner of the access request and direct the petitioner to promptly file a petition from which the confidential information has been redacted as required under Rule 33.01 so that access may be provided to the requesting individual.

***** 201S§. Advisory Committee Comment Rule 8. 03 is added to clarify that access to juvenile protection case records filed with or generated by the court prior to July 1, 2015, or (or case records tiled prior to October 1, 2016, in cases where a child is a party, shall be denied until it is determined that the record or portion of the record requested is free of confidential information to which access is restricted under Rule 8. 04. When an individual requests access to a petition filed prior to July 1, 2015, and the petition contains confidential information to which access is restricted under Rule 8. 04, court administration staffmay notify the petitioner of the access request and direct the petitioner to promptly file an appropriately-redacted petition so that access may be provided to the requesting individual.

4. Amend Rule 8.04, as follows:

Rule 8.04. Juvenile Protection Case Records Inaccessible to the Public, Parties, or Participants ***** Subd. 2. Confidential Documents and Confidential Information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pending court proceedings
25 U.S.C. § 1912

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROTECTION PROCEDURE. ADM10-8041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/order-promulgating-amendments-to-the-rules-of-juvenile-protection-minn-2016.