Order
This text of Order (Order) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STERLING TATE1, § § Respondent Below, § No. 395, 2020 Appellant, § § Court Below – Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § CAMILLE TATE, § § File No. CN18-03247 Petitioner Below, § Petition No. 20-10933 Appellee. § §
Submitted: August 11, 2021 Decided: September 7, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we conclude that the
judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the Family
Court’s October 20, 2020 final custody order. In reaching this conclusion, we have
determined that the Family Court did not impose a condition on the Appellant’s ability to file
a petition for modification, but rather illustrated steps that the Appellant ought to—but need
not—take before seeking visitation rights.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves Justice
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Order, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/order-del-2021.