Ordaz-Flores v. Sessions

713 F. App'x 511
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2017·No. No. 17-1665·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision to deny his application for cancellation of removal on discretionary hardship grounds under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). After careful review, we conclude that the IJ used the proper standard in denying relief, and thus that Ordaz-Flores has not raised a cognizable challenge to the decision below. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial, see Gomez-Perez v. Holder, 569 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009), and we dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordaz-Flores v. Sessions, 713 F. App'x 511 (8th Cir. 2017).

713 F. App'x 511 (Ordaz-Flores v. Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Marcus Eason
907 F.3d 554 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)