Orchard Heights, Inc. v. Yancy

15 A.D.3d 854, 788 N.Y.S.2d 763, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1246
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2005·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), entered May 13, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order denied the motion of intervenor seeking dismissal of the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Orchard Park Central School District to dismiss the petition in this proceeding commenced pursuant to RPTL article 7 to review petitioner’s 2003-2004 real property tax assessment. RPTL 708 (3) provides that “one copy of the petition and notice shall be mailed within ten days from the date of service thereof ... to the superintendent of schools of any school district within which any part of the real property on which the assessment is to be reviewed is located.” It is undisputed that petitioner erroneously served the Clerk of the Schools, not the Superintendent. “Failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall result in the dismissal of the petition, unless excused for good cause shown” (id.). “[Tjhere is no statutory exception with respect to the absence of prejudice” (Matter of Premier Self Storage of Lancaster v Fusco, 12 AD3d 1135, 1136 [2004]; see also Matter of Clay Dome & Golf Ctr. v Board of As[855] sessors of Town of Clay, 300 AD2d 1092 [2002]). Because petitioner failed to comply with the mailing requirement of section 708 (3), and failed to make a showing of good cause, we reverse the order, grant the motion and dismiss the petition (see Premier Self Stor. of Lancaster, 12 AD3d at 1135). Present— Green, J.E, Scudder, Martoche, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orchard Heights, Inc. v. Yancy, 15 A.D.3d 854, 788 N.Y.S.2d 763, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 854 (Orchard Heights, Inc. v. Yancy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MatterofHighbridgeDevelopmentBR,LLCvAssessoroftheTownofNiskayuna
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Highbridge Development BR, LLC v. Assessor of the Town of Niskayuna
121 A.D.3d 1324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of City of Rye
37 Misc. 3d 238 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
Wyeth Holdings Corp. v. Assessor of the Town of Orangetown
84 A.D.3d 1104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Assessor & Board of Assessment Review
82 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Board of Managers of Copley Court Condominium v. Town of Ossining
79 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Ryan v. Town of Cortlandt
30 Misc. 3d 560 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Wyeth Holdings Corp. v. Assessor of the Town of Orangetown
25 Misc. 3d 1002 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)
Harris Bay Yacht Club, Inc. v. Town of Queensbury
46 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Landesman v. Whitton
46 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
MM1, LLC v. LaVancher
45 A.D.3d 1481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Gatsby Industrial Real Estate, Inc. v. Fox
45 A.D.3d 1480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)