Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Orbach ex rel. Jarold Shops, Inc. v. Diamond

Orbach ex rel. Jarold Shops, Inc. v. Diamond

278 A.D. 651, 102 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4216
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1951
StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D. 651 (Orbach ex rel. Jarold Shops, Inc. v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orbach ex rel. Jarold Shops, Inc. v. Diamond, 278 A.D. 651, 102 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by deleting from items 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the notice of examination the words “fradulently and unlawfully ” and “ unlawful reasons ” and by directing that books and papers relevant to the subject of examination are to be produced pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act instead of in accordance with Beeber v. Empire Power Go. (260 App. Div. 68, and cases there cited) and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P, J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beeber v. Empire Power Corp.
260 A.D. 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 651, 102 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orbach-ex-rel-jarold-shops-inc-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1951.