Orange & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Fairchilds
220 S.W. 798, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 411, 1920 WL 24
This text of 220 S.W. 798 (Orange & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Fairchilds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Orange & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Fairchilds, 220 S.W. 798, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 411, 1920 WL 24 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
This is a motion filed in this court on February 25, 1920, praying for an order directing the clerk of this court to file a transcript and statement of facts. The motion is denied, and ordered dismissed for the reasons stated in disposing of motion No. 885, Orange & Northwestern Railway Co. et al. v. Leroy Pruter, 220 S. W. 797, this day disposed of.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Orange & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Pruter
220 S.W. 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 S.W. 798, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 411, 1920 WL 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orange-n-w-ry-co-v-fairchilds-texapp-1920.