Orange County v. Buchman
95 So. 3d 471, 2012 WL 3627375, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Orange County v. Buchman. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382 →
Opinion
This is an appeal of the judgment for costs in an eminent domain proceeding. Because we reversed in part the underlying judgment and remanded it for a new [472]*472trial, we reverse and remand the judgment under appeal. See Mulato v. Mulato, 734 So.2d 477, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA.1999).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orange County v. Buchman, 95 So. 3d 471, 2012 WL 3627375, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
95 So. 3d 471 (Orange County v. Buchman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mulato v. Mulato
734 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)