Orange County School Board v. Shoemaker

782 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4793, 2001 WL 360135
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-2210
StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 529 (Orange County School Board v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orange County School Board v. Shoemaker, 782 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4793, 2001 WL 360135 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The transcript of the final hearing in this workers’ compensation proceeding is incomplete because of mechanical problems with the recording equipment. The Judge of Compensation Claims has certified that the parties are unable to develop a statement of the evidence. Accordingly, the final order is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. See, Calvin’s Heavy Equipment, Inc. v. Kirkland, 699 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Calvin's Heavy Equipment, Inc. v. Kirkland
699 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4793, 2001 WL 360135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orange-county-school-board-v-shoemaker-fladistctapp-2001.