Orange County Deputy Sheriffs' Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Orange County

281 A.D.2d 422, 721 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2096

This text of 281 A.D.2d 422 (Orange County Deputy Sheriffs' Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Orange County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orange County Deputy Sheriffs' Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Orange County, 281 A.D.2d 422, 721 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel arbitration, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated February 24, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a hearing and new determination in accordance herewith.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing to determine if the petitioners had timely filed a demand for arbitration pursuant to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement. Service of the decision at issue upon the landlord of the petitioner Clifford Barber, Jr. (hereinafter Barber), did not constitute receipt of the decision by Barber. However, issues of fact were raised as to when the demand for arbitration was filed, thereby requiring a hearing (see, CPLR 7503 [a], [c]). A prompt hearing is required when the filing of a timely demand for arbitration is a condition precedent to arbitration, and issues are presented as to whether the demand was timely .filed (see, Matter of MVAIC [Stein], 23 AD2d 526; see also, Grossman v Laurence Handprints-N.J., 90 AD2d 95). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a hearing to determine whether the demand for arbitration was timely filed (see, CPLR 7503 [a], [c]). S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Stein
23 A.D.2d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.
90 A.D.2d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 422, 721 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orange-county-deputy-sheriffs-police-benevolent-assn-v-orange-county-nyappdiv-2001.