Oran Young v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Oran Young v. United States

329 F.2d 316

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1964

Docket7541_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 329 F.2d 316 (Oran Young v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oran Young v. United States, 329 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the fourth attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the sufficiency of the information charging that the petitioner did “enter” a state insured bank “with intent then while in said bank and therein to commit a felony * * *.” See Young v. United States, 294 F.2d 517, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 368 U.S. 979, 82 S.Ct. 484, 7 L.Ed.2d 440; and Young v. United States, 309 F.2d 749, 10 Cir., cer-tiorari denied 371 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 546, 9 L.Ed.2d 511. This petition under § 2255 is based on the contention that the information does not allege that the petitioner entered the bank with the requisite intent to commit a felony but formed the intent after entry. As we read the information, it charges with sufficient clarity that the petitioner entered the bank with the intent to commit the felony. See Martin v. United States, 10 Cir., 285 F.2d 150; and Godish v. United States, 10 Cir., 182 F.2d 342.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the fourth attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the sufficiency of the information charging that the petitioner did “enter” a state insured bank “with intent then while in said bank and therein to commit a felony * * *.” See Young v. United States, 294 F.2d 517, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 368 U.S. 979, 82 S.Ct. 484, 7 L.Ed.2d 440; and Young v. United States, 309 F.2d 749, 10 Cir., cer-tiorari denied 371 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 546, 9 L.Ed.2d 511. This petition under § 2255 is based on the contention that the information does not allege that the petitioner entered the bank with the requisite intent to commit a felony but formed the intent after entry. As we read the information, it charges with sufficient clarity that the petitioner entered the bank with the intent to commit the felony. See Martin v. United States, 10 Cir., 285 F.2d 150; and Godish v. United States, 10 Cir., 182 F.2d 342.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 F.2d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oran-young-v-united-states-ca10-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack