Oramas v. State
This text of 615 So. 2d 853 (Oramas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jesus Moreno ORAMAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*854 PER CURIAM.
Jesus Oramas appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion did not contain any facts in support of the allegations set out and so was properly denied by the circuit court as facially insufficient. The defendant had submitted a memorandum of law in addition to his motion, which contained factual allegations which formed the basis for the relief sought. However, the memorandum of law did not contain the proper oath in derogation of Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of the appellant's motion for postconviction relief without prejudice to the appellant's right to seek relief upon a properly sworn motion.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 So. 2d 853, 1993 WL 75803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oramas-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.