Oram v. Kirchik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oram v. Kirchik

270 A.D. 764, 59 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 764 (Oram v. Kirchik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oram v. Kirchik, 270 A.D. 764, 59 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for specific performance of an agreement to sell stock, order denying motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. There is an issue presented as to the construction to be accorded the term “ assets ” as used in the written contract. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for specific performance of an agreement to sell stock, order denying motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. There is an issue presented as to the construction to be accorded the term “ assets ” as used in the written contract. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D. 764, 59 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oram-v-kirchik-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack