Oram v. Kirchik
270 A.D. 764, 59 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an action for specific performance of an agreement to sell stock, order denying motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. There is an issue presented as to the construction to be accorded the term “ assets ” as used in the written contract. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oram v. Kirchik, 270 A.D. 764, 59 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).
270 A.D. 764 (Oram v. Kirchik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago Research & Trading v. New York Futures Exchange, Inc.
84 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)