Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 750 F.3d 1339
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 10, 2012·No. 2013-1021·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 13-1021 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. __________________________

2013-1021, -1022 __________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 10-CV-3561, Judge William H. Alsup. __________________________

ON MOTION __________________________

ORDER Google Inc. moves without opposition for leave to sub- stitute Christa M. Anderson as principal counsel. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Case: 13-1021 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2012

ORACLE AMERICA, INC. V. GOOGLE INC. 2

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s21

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.