O'Quinn v. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co.
This text of 66 S.E. 810 (O'Quinn v. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a suit by a passenger against a railroad company to recover damages for personal injuries, a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, in tlie sum of $4,300. There was conflict in the evidence as to the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. On his motion for a new trial, held, that any error of law relating to the defendant’s liability was rendered harmless by the verdict, unless it was such as might have influenced the jury to reduce the amount that the plaintiff was entitled to recover.
2. There was no error of law in the admission-of evidence or in the charge of the court which could have affected injuriously or materially, the amount of the damages that the plaintiff was entitled to recover.
3. The amount of the verdict was exclusively a question for the determination of the jury, under all the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 810, 7 Ga. App. 309, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oquinn-v-douglas-augusta-gulf-railway-co-gactapp-1910.