O'Quin v. State

90 S.W.2d 570
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 1936
DocketNo. 17897
StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.W.2d 570 (O'Quin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Quin v. State, 90 S.W.2d 570 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Under proper indictment, the appellant was convicted of the offense of theft, and his penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought forward for review. Nothing is perceived which would authorize interference with the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.W.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oquin-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.